{"id":243,"date":"2025-12-23T13:22:30","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T05:22:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/?p=243"},"modified":"2025-12-23T17:14:33","modified_gmt":"2025-12-23T09:14:33","slug":"cachefly-cdn-review-under-real-traffic-and-attack-pressure-does-this-veteran-cdn-still-deliver","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/243-html","title":{"rendered":"CacheFly CDN Review: Under Real Traffic and Attack Pressure, Is This Veteran CDN Still Worth Using?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"cdn-review cachefly-review\">\n<p>Choosing CacheFly for testing wasn't because it's \u201csuper popular\u201d\u2014quite the opposite. It's precisely because it has a very low profile in the domestic tech community, yet it consistently appears in certain...<strong>Streaming media, game downloads, enterprise distribution<\/strong>In the scene.<\/p>\n<p>The purpose of this test is straightforward: When mainstream CDNs (Cloudflare\/CloudFront) exhibit unstable performance in certain regions, can CacheFly still serve as an engineering fallback option?<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">I. Actual Deployment Context and Test Environment<\/h3>\n<p>The onboarding process for CacheFly is straightforward, but it is clearly<strong>Engineer-centric mindset<\/strong>The console design is relatively traditional, lacking any obvious product-oriented guidance.<\/p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"8\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th align=\"left\">Project<\/th>\n<th align=\"left\">Explanation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CDN Service Provider<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cachefly.com\/\">CacheFly<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Testing Party<\/td>\n<td>This Site's Cybersecurity Testing Team<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Access Method<\/td>\n<td>DNS CNAME records pointing to the accelerated domain name provided by CacheFly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Origin server<\/td>\n<td>Dedicated VPS (Nginx, Los Angeles)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Test Content<\/td>\n<td>Static Resource Distribution + DDoS Stress Testing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Testing Cycle<\/td>\n<td>Approximately 3 weeks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">II. CacheFly Billing Method (Very Important)<\/h3>\n<p>The key difference between CacheFly and AWS\/Azure lies in:<strong>It is a \u201cbundle + negotiated pricing\u201d CDN.<\/strong>rather than a fully open pay-as-you-go billing model.<\/p>\n<p>During the actual connection process, you must confirm the data plan tier with the official sales representative before assigning the corresponding monthly package.<\/p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"8\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Project<\/th>\n<th>Explanation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Billing Model<\/td>\n<td>Monthly Data Plan (Starting at TB Level)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Excess traffic<\/td>\n<td>Subject to separate negotiation or charged at the agreed unit price.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>DDoS Protection<\/td>\n<td>Included in the service, no separate toggle<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Test Package<\/td>\n<td>Official Test-Level Traffic Plan<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The advantages of this model are:<strong>Costs are predictable<\/strong>The drawbacks are also quite obvious:<strong>Less flexible than cloud providers<\/strong>\u3002<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">III. CDN Acceleration Testing (Real-World Access Data)<\/h3>\n<pre><code>\r\ncurl -o \/dev\/null -s -w \\ \"TTFB: %{time_starttransfer}s\\nTotal: %{time_total}s\\nHTTP: %{http_code}\\n\" \\ https:\/\/cdn-test.example.com\/static\/large-file.bin\r\n  <\/code><\/pre>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"8\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>Region<\/th>\n<th>Time to First Byte (TTFB)<\/th>\n<th>Total time (s)<\/th>\n<th>Status Code<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Western United States<\/td>\n<td>0.09<\/td>\n<td>0.41<\/td>\n<td>200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Europe<\/td>\n<td>0.14<\/td>\n<td>0.58<\/td>\n<td>200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Asia (SG)<\/td>\n<td>0.21<\/td>\n<td>0.76<\/td>\n<td>200<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>CacheFly's features are quite distinct:<strong>The first package wasn't particularly impressive, but the transmission process was extremely stable.<\/strong>When downloading large files, jitter is significantly lower than some mainstream CDNs.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">IV. DDoS Stress Testing (Engineering Perspective)<\/h3>\n<p>This test focuses more on a real-world issue:<strong>When an attack occurs, will it redirect traffic back to the origin server?<\/strong><\/p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"8\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th>stage<\/th>\n<th>HTTP 200<\/th>\n<th>Exception Return<\/th>\n<th>Origin Server CPU<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Normal<\/td>\n<td>99.91% TP3T<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Under attack<\/td>\n<td>91.21 TP3T<\/td>\n<td>403 \/ 429<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>After the attack<\/td>\n<td>99.81 TP3T<\/td>\n<td>a small amount<\/td>\n<td>13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Under a medium-scale HTTP flood attack,<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/links\/68-html\/\">CacheFly<\/a> behavioral bias<strong>Speed limit directly at the edge<\/strong>Backend traffic control is relatively restrained.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">V. Issues Encountered in Actual Use<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>The console features are somewhat outdated, and the learning curve is steep.<\/li>\n<li>Caching rules require engineering background and are not suitable for beginners.<\/li>\n<li>Logging and analytics capabilities are not as robust as those offered by cloud providers.<\/li>\n<li>However, the quality of technical support responses is significantly above average.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">VI. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h3>\n<h4>Is CacheFly suitable for small websites or personal projects?<\/h4>\n<p>It's not quite suitable; it's more geared toward enterprise or stable traffic scenarios.<\/p>\n<h4>Can CacheFly's DDoS protection be configured independently?<\/h4>\n<p>No, protection strategies are primarily built-in and automated.<\/p>\n<h4>What are the core differences between CacheFly and Cloudflare?<\/h4>\n<p>CacheFly leans more toward \u201ccontent delivery engineering,\u201d while Cloudflare leans more toward \u201cplatform-based security products.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #d6336c;\">VII. Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>If you're expecting a CDN that's \u201cjust a few clicks away and has a pretty interface,\u201d CacheFly might disappoint you.<\/p>\n<p>But if your business<strong>Stability, large file distribution, predictable costs<\/strong>More sensitive, CacheFly is actually an underrated engineering-focused CDN.<\/p>\n<p>It's not about \u201cselling products\u201d\u2014it's more about \u201cdelivering your content reliably.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Choosing CacheFly for testing wasn't because it's \u201ctrending,\u201d but rather the opposite\u2014it has a very low profile in China's tech community, yet it consistently appears in streaming media, game downloads, and enterprise distribution scenarios. The purpose of this test is straightforward: When mainstream CDNs (Cloudflare\/CloudFront) exhibit instability in certain regions, can CacheFly still serve as an \u201cengineering fallback option\u201d? I. Practical Deployment Context and Test Environment CacheFly's onboarding process is straightforward but distinctly engineer-centric, featuring a conventional console design lacking clear product-driven guidance. Project Description CDN Provider CacheFly Testing Party This Site Network Security<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[88,92,90,89,91,93,94],"collection":[],"class_list":["post-243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cdn-performance","tag-cachefly-cdn-","tag-cachefly-cdn","tag-cachefly-ddos","tag-cachefly","tag-cdn"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=243"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/243\/revisions\/244"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=243"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ddosgj.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}